» » » The Transgender Experiment on Kids

The Transgender Experiment on Kids

transgender experimentChannel 4’s ‘Born in the Wrong Body’ recent season of programming began with the episode ‘My Transgender Kid’, doing its bit to reinforce uncritical mass acceptance of the idea that children have an innate ‘gender identity’ which overrides their biological sex.

The Tavistock and Portman gender clinic has seen referrals increase by 50% every year since 2009, and we are likely to see a continued rise in referrals of children the more publicity is given to ‘brave’ parents on TV and throughout the popular media. On seeking information, worried parents will be directed to ‘gender support’ groups such as Mermaids, who will frighten them further with misleading statistics on suicide rates of young ‘trans’ people. The ‘trans’ label in itself may be covering up underlying psychological or emotional issues which remain undiagnosed by therapists keener to exhibit their social-justice credentials than their clinical judgment. Meanwhile, what remains undisclosed is the fact that hormone treatment and surgery is not effective in bringing these figures down.

The pressure on schools to go along with the trans narrative will also increase if The Gender Identity Research and Education Society gets its way. GIRES has presented evidence to the Women and Equalities Committee, calling for children as young as three to be taught about transgender issues in school. The trans advocacy charity criticised the DfE for failing to include ‘atypical gender identity development’ in the curriculum.

Teaching children that it’s fine to be ‘atypical’ simply involves allowing children to play with whatever they want, encouraging all children in an expansive definition of what their sex can be, and having no tolerance for teasing or bullying of those children whose behaviour doesn’t fit the stereotypes for their sex.

What GIRES are advocating though, is giving kids the opposite message. Through books in which right-on versions of Pingu tell their friends ‘We’ll tell them you are Sally and were never really John!’ they want children to be taught that if you are a boy who likes what society deems to be ‘girl’ interests, then you must actually be a girl.

Schools are in a bind: teach all children that a little boy can be a little girl and grow up to be an adult woman, and little girls can grow up to become adult men, or be seen as transphobic. If we do teach children that these things are possible, we also have to re-write the whole biology curriculum – perhaps we could call it Biological Creationism.

The theory that children have an innate ‘gender identity’ which does not match their biological sex has no scientific basis; it is impossible to have a brain which is the opposite sex of the body. The idea that male and female brains are significantly different has long been discredited. There is no existence of a pathophysiology to support treatment: to have preferences typically associated with people of the opposite sex is not a pathology, and there is nothing medically wrong with the body.

To even make the claim that a child is biologically male but ‘is a girl inside’ requires a definition of the term ‘girl’ as a recognised category with a set of definable characteristics. The definition we have is the biological classification ‘young female.’ Beyond that, we are in the realm of subjective judgment and stereotype. If ‘girl’ is a self-definition, an identity or a feeling, then the word means potentially anything and therefore nothing.

Children in any case have no fixed innate ‘identity;’ children’s identities are in process of being built through interaction with environmental influences, without which identity cannot develop. ‘Social transition’ then is nothing short of indoctrination into a trans identity.

There is also no evidence that a child’s non-conforming behaviour is in itself problematic for the child, or whether any experienced distress is caused by secondary factors such as the judgements of adults, imposed restrictions of expression or teasing and bullying from peers.

We are nevertheless advised by self-appointed gender specialists to try to fix something non-pathological in the head by medically treating the healthy physical body; making this the only situation in which medical intervention does not cure a sick body, but healthy organs are mutilated in order to match a psychological identity.

The facts, verified by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health, are that most children with ‘Gender Identity Disorder’ will grow out of it by adolescence, and the overwhelming majority will be gay or lesbian. Given this fact, we should be wary that the ‘transing’ of children is effectively just another form of gay conversion therapy.

So where is the outcry? It’s certainly not coming from the Lib Dems who have just voted to support the ‘right’ of gender-variant children to receive puberty blockers until they are eligible for cross-sex hormone treatments. The Women and Equalities Select Committee on Transgender Rights have also hinted at ‘radical’ changes after hundreds of submissions from adult transgender people and activists, which suggests that a critical examination of this treatment of children is not going to happen any time soon.

We have no idea of the effects of puberty blockers on brain development; but in effect we are suspending children in a childhood state, ostensibly to ‘give them time to decide’ but clearly making that decision a foregone conclusion as the point that kids typically change their minds is during normal puberty. We also know that hormone treatments affect bone mass density and result in life-long sterility, but there is no research on other long-term effects on health.

In fact, no ‘gender specialist’ can tell you the long-term consequences of these radical treatments on children’s healthy bodies, because nobody knows. By setting children off on a path of sterilisation and medicalisation for life we are performing nothing less than an unprecedented and mind-boggling experiment using the children of this generation as the guinea pigs.

I originally wrote this article for The Wales Arts Review but I thought it belonged on this blog, so I am publishing it here in a slightly updated version. For any parents who want to know more about the issue I am in the process of setting up a resource site at transgendertrend.com in collaboration with other parents. It’s not finished yet, but please pass it on to any parents you think may be interested!

3 Responses

  1. […] a powerful piece,  “The Transgender Experiment on Kids” for the Wales Arts Review (now published on her own blog), critiquing the increasingly worrying child and adolescent “transition” […]

  2. Sian Life
    | Reply

    I’d like to challenge you on a few points. It seems from this article that you are most concerned with the use of puberty blockers. The problem that I have with your blog is that it fails to distinguish between children and teenagers (or adolescents) at many points throughout. This seems to be very misleading and portrays untrue facts at times. For example, when you quote WPATH report you say that most children will grow out of gender dysphoria by adolescence – correct. But you then go on to say “and of those who don’t, the overwhelming majority will be gay or lesbian” (you then make some absurd statement comparing it to conversion therapy!) which is complete untrue and not backed up by the report. What they actually say is “Boys in these studies were more likely to identify as gay in adulthood than as transgender (Green, 1987; Money & Russo, 1979; Zucker & Bradley, 1995; Zuger, 1984)” – meaning that boys that identify as transgender as a children (but crucially NOT into adolescence) are more likely to be gay as an adult. The report then goes on to say “In contrast, the persistence of gender dysphoria into adulthood appears to be much higher for adolescents.” This is VERY important information when talking about puberty blockers as puberty blockers can typically only be described in the second stage of puberty (i.e. adolescent teenagers).

    • Stephanie Davies-Arai
      | Reply

      Thanks for your comment Sian. This piece is about children, not adolescents. The research studies show that the rate of persistence of GID is around 2 – 20% in children AND adolescents. It may be the lower end for children and the higher end for adolescents but that still means the overwhelming majority will not be trans. As it is common knowledge that the majority of kids who we now call ‘trans’ are in fact gay, to suggest that homophobia might be at play is not far-fetched. There is increasing pressure to prescribe puberty blockers as soon as puberty begins, effectively preventing children from maturing, ostensibly to give them ‘time to decide’ but in effect any decisions made will still be those of a child, so are not likely to change. I don’t think conversion therapy is too strong a term to use for that process.

Leave a Reply

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.